.jpg)
───────────────
<< Sadly, removing DDT has killed more people than Hitler. >>
▬ Michael Crichton. « State of Fear ». 2004.
───────────────
It has been estimated that Rachel Carson and her « stepchildren » can be ranked among the GREATEST MASS KILLERS in recent history.
Since 1972, the Carson policies have led to deaths by malaria resulting from world–wide bans on DDT ( but not by democide ).
Sadly, Carson’s subversions served as an example and inspiration for aspiring environmental–terrorists.
Rachel Carson and her « stepchildren » are responsible for the deaths of 30 to 50 million people.
───────────────
The Depraved Indifference of Enviro–Terrorists
Environmental–Terrorists operate on the false premise that untrammelled nature is always benign.
Environmental–Terrorists have a single–minded focus on the so–called « health » of the environment, the planet, or the ecosystem. Unfortunately, they are blind to the clear and present dangers posed to people, plants, and animals.
Many Environmental–Terrorists have prescribed actions that have been in direct conflict with public health, and with the preservation of our green spaces.
Environmental–Terrorists have encouraged destructive policies that have led to the devastation of our forests and landscapes, and the death of millions of people.
Environmental–Terrorists have killed more people than Hitler.
It has been observed that the removal of DDT showed that the West has DEPRAVED INDIFFERENCE for those suffering in Third World countries. Treatments were used long enough in the Southern United States and Southern Europe to eliminate insect–borne diseases, but now that DDT is only needed in poor countries, such as those found in Africa and Asia, it has been removed.
According to Paul K. Driessen, author of « Eco–Imperialism ― Green Power, Black Death » ―
<< Now, well–off environmental activists can afford to rail against pesticide use in Africa, while they enjoy all the comforts that our high–tech, malaria–free society bestows upon them. >>
For decades, many countries have been coming under pressure from international health and environmental agencies to give up DDT, or face losing aid grants or trade sanctions.
Both Belize and Bolivia have gone on record to say that they gave in to such pressure from the U.S. Agency for International Development ( U.S.A.I.D. ).
Furthermore, many African nations want to use DDT to save lives, but they have been told their agricultural exports may not be accepted if spraying becomes « widespread ».
Additionally, the European Union ( E.U. ) has threatened trade sanctions against countries like Uganda that seek to use DDT, even solely for malaria control.
Happily, these anti–DDT policies have finally changed in the Twenty–First Century.
───────────────
The removal DDT led to the death of millions
The Green Space Industry needs to remind the public that the world–wide removal of DDT led to the unnecessary injury and death of millions of people.
In our world of politicized science, DDT had to be eliminated in order to save the environment.
Sadly, the protection of the environment appears to be a cause that is greater than any human suffering.
This is clearly a form of « DEPRAVED INDIFFERENCE » on the part of Environmental–Terrorists.
According to Dr. Gordon Edwards ―
<< 190 people per minute are either dying or suffering directly or indirectly from the U.S. ban of DDT and other pesticides. >>
───────────────
The removal of DDT
In 1972, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ( E.P.A. ) announced a cancellation on virtually all uses of DDT. DDT was also removed from Chile (1985), Cuba (1970), Korea (1986), Liechtenstein (1986), Norway and Sweden (1970), Poland (1976), Singapore (1984), Switzerland (1986), and the United Kingdom (1984). The Canadian government did not immediately follow the 1972 U.S. decision.
In Canada, the removal of DDT was more gradual and logical. Most uses of DDT were phased out by the mid–1970s. The registration of all uses of DDT was discontinued in 1985, with the understanding that existing stocks would be sold, used, or disposed of, by the end of 1990. However, after 1990, the sale and use of DDT in Canada was not permitted under the federal Pest Control Products Act. The Canadian phased reduction of DDT was important in that it helped to avoid the creation of large–scale disposal problems. At the municipal level, collection programs were set up to dispose of DDT locally.
By the end of the Twentieth Century, the basic production of DDT continued in countries like ― India, Indonesia, Italy, and Mexico.
───────────────
The impact of the removal of DDT
There is still a great deal of controversy regarding the decision to remove DDT from the world market.
One popular debate can be summarized as follows ―
The restrictions on the use of DDT has resulted in millions of unnecessary deaths !
───────────────
According to Michael Crichton ...
In 2004, popular author Michael Crichton summed up the situation with the following excerpt from his book entitled « State of Fear » ―
<< Arguably, the greatest tragedy of the Twentieth Century was the removal of DDT. DDT was the best insecticide for the control of mosquitoes. Despite views to the contrary, no other products were as efficient, or as safe. Since the removal of DDT, it has been estimated that thirty to fifty million people have died unnecessarily from the effects of malaria. Sadly, removing DDT has killed more people than Hitler. Before the removal of DDT, malaria had become almost a minor illness, with only fifty thousand deaths per year throughout the world. >>
───────────────
Environmental–Terror and the Death of Millions
Environmental–Terrorists have encouraged destructive policies that have led to the death of millions of people.
Some people have accused the Environmental–Terrorists of « Eco–Manslaughter ».
Environmental–Terrorists have killed more people than Hitler.
Let’s look at the statistics.
It is believed that malaria acutely afflicts more than 515 million people per year.
Two–thirds of all cases occur in Africa.
Additionally, malaria causes more than ONE MILLION deaths per year, principally among children under the age of five years and pregnant women.
Some say TWO MILLION deaths.
It has been over thirty–five years since the removal of DDT.
The reader can do the math.
At least THIRTY MILLION deaths.
Up to FIFTY MILLION deaths. Or more.
Nazi persecution killed an estimated nine to eleven million people.
Some say Nazi persecution killed fifteen million.
We do not mean to say that that Environmental–Terrorists are responsible for cold–blooded murder.
But, it is interesting to make the comparison with the great mass murderers of history.
───────────────
Description of Mass Murderers in Recent History.
(Cold–blooded murder of unarmed combatants.)
Environmental–Terrorists. 35 to 50 million.
Stalin. 20 million.
Hitler. 9 to 15 million.
Mao. Up to 76 million.
<< Sadly, removing DDT has killed more people than Hitler. >>
▬ Michael Crichton. « State of Fear ». 2004.
───────────────
It has been estimated that Rachel Carson and her « stepchildren » can be ranked among the GREATEST MASS KILLERS in recent history.
Since 1972, the Carson policies have led to deaths by malaria resulting from world–wide bans on DDT ( but not by democide ).
Sadly, Carson’s subversions served as an example and inspiration for aspiring environmental–terrorists.
Rachel Carson and her « stepchildren » are responsible for the deaths of 30 to 50 million people.
───────────────
The Depraved Indifference of Enviro–Terrorists
Environmental–Terrorists operate on the false premise that untrammelled nature is always benign.
Environmental–Terrorists have a single–minded focus on the so–called « health » of the environment, the planet, or the ecosystem. Unfortunately, they are blind to the clear and present dangers posed to people, plants, and animals.
Many Environmental–Terrorists have prescribed actions that have been in direct conflict with public health, and with the preservation of our green spaces.
Environmental–Terrorists have encouraged destructive policies that have led to the devastation of our forests and landscapes, and the death of millions of people.
Environmental–Terrorists have killed more people than Hitler.
It has been observed that the removal of DDT showed that the West has DEPRAVED INDIFFERENCE for those suffering in Third World countries. Treatments were used long enough in the Southern United States and Southern Europe to eliminate insect–borne diseases, but now that DDT is only needed in poor countries, such as those found in Africa and Asia, it has been removed.
According to Paul K. Driessen, author of « Eco–Imperialism ― Green Power, Black Death » ―
<< Now, well–off environmental activists can afford to rail against pesticide use in Africa, while they enjoy all the comforts that our high–tech, malaria–free society bestows upon them. >>
For decades, many countries have been coming under pressure from international health and environmental agencies to give up DDT, or face losing aid grants or trade sanctions.
Both Belize and Bolivia have gone on record to say that they gave in to such pressure from the U.S. Agency for International Development ( U.S.A.I.D. ).
Furthermore, many African nations want to use DDT to save lives, but they have been told their agricultural exports may not be accepted if spraying becomes « widespread ».
Additionally, the European Union ( E.U. ) has threatened trade sanctions against countries like Uganda that seek to use DDT, even solely for malaria control.
Happily, these anti–DDT policies have finally changed in the Twenty–First Century.
───────────────
The removal DDT led to the death of millions
The Green Space Industry needs to remind the public that the world–wide removal of DDT led to the unnecessary injury and death of millions of people.
In our world of politicized science, DDT had to be eliminated in order to save the environment.
Sadly, the protection of the environment appears to be a cause that is greater than any human suffering.
This is clearly a form of « DEPRAVED INDIFFERENCE » on the part of Environmental–Terrorists.
According to Dr. Gordon Edwards ―
<< 190 people per minute are either dying or suffering directly or indirectly from the U.S. ban of DDT and other pesticides. >>
───────────────
The removal of DDT
In 1972, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ( E.P.A. ) announced a cancellation on virtually all uses of DDT. DDT was also removed from Chile (1985), Cuba (1970), Korea (1986), Liechtenstein (1986), Norway and Sweden (1970), Poland (1976), Singapore (1984), Switzerland (1986), and the United Kingdom (1984). The Canadian government did not immediately follow the 1972 U.S. decision.
In Canada, the removal of DDT was more gradual and logical. Most uses of DDT were phased out by the mid–1970s. The registration of all uses of DDT was discontinued in 1985, with the understanding that existing stocks would be sold, used, or disposed of, by the end of 1990. However, after 1990, the sale and use of DDT in Canada was not permitted under the federal Pest Control Products Act. The Canadian phased reduction of DDT was important in that it helped to avoid the creation of large–scale disposal problems. At the municipal level, collection programs were set up to dispose of DDT locally.
By the end of the Twentieth Century, the basic production of DDT continued in countries like ― India, Indonesia, Italy, and Mexico.
───────────────
The impact of the removal of DDT
There is still a great deal of controversy regarding the decision to remove DDT from the world market.
One popular debate can be summarized as follows ―
The restrictions on the use of DDT has resulted in millions of unnecessary deaths !
───────────────
According to Michael Crichton ...
In 2004, popular author Michael Crichton summed up the situation with the following excerpt from his book entitled « State of Fear » ―
<< Arguably, the greatest tragedy of the Twentieth Century was the removal of DDT. DDT was the best insecticide for the control of mosquitoes. Despite views to the contrary, no other products were as efficient, or as safe. Since the removal of DDT, it has been estimated that thirty to fifty million people have died unnecessarily from the effects of malaria. Sadly, removing DDT has killed more people than Hitler. Before the removal of DDT, malaria had become almost a minor illness, with only fifty thousand deaths per year throughout the world. >>
───────────────
Environmental–Terror and the Death of Millions
Environmental–Terrorists have encouraged destructive policies that have led to the death of millions of people.
Some people have accused the Environmental–Terrorists of « Eco–Manslaughter ».
Environmental–Terrorists have killed more people than Hitler.
Let’s look at the statistics.
It is believed that malaria acutely afflicts more than 515 million people per year.
Two–thirds of all cases occur in Africa.
Additionally, malaria causes more than ONE MILLION deaths per year, principally among children under the age of five years and pregnant women.
Some say TWO MILLION deaths.
It has been over thirty–five years since the removal of DDT.
The reader can do the math.
At least THIRTY MILLION deaths.
Up to FIFTY MILLION deaths. Or more.
Nazi persecution killed an estimated nine to eleven million people.
Some say Nazi persecution killed fifteen million.
We do not mean to say that that Environmental–Terrorists are responsible for cold–blooded murder.
But, it is interesting to make the comparison with the great mass murderers of history.
───────────────
Description of Mass Murderers in Recent History.
(Cold–blooded murder of unarmed combatants.)
Environmental–Terrorists. 35 to 50 million.
Stalin. 20 million.
Hitler. 9 to 15 million.
Mao. Up to 76 million.
───────────────
According to Paul Driessen ...
Paul K. Driessen wrote the book « Eco–Imperialism ― Green Power, Black Death » in 2003.
Driessen claimed that malaria deaths are TWO MILLION per year.
Moreover, the hundreds of millions who « survive » the disease are too sick to work or take care of their families. They become more vulnerable to subsequent diseases, such as AIDS, dysentery, and tuberculosis.
The survivors are obviously not able to adequately contribute to the economy.
It is no wonder that Sub–Saharan Africa is one of the most destitute regions on Earth.
───────────────
Conclusion
Environmental–Terrorists have been wrong for over fifty years.
Environmental–Terrorists suffer from depraved indifference.
Environmental–Terrorists have killed more people than Hitler.
───────────────
William H. Gathercole and Norah G
National Organization Responding Against Huje that TERRORIZE, HARM, and THREATEN the Green Space Industry (NORAHG)
William H. Gathercole, Founder
For a free Force Of Nature e–newsletter, contact force.of.de.nature@gmail.com
───────────────
FORCE OF NATURE is a series of e–newsletters destined for the Green Space Industry, the Environmental Terror Movement, Governments, and the Media, nationwide across Canada, the United States, and overseas. The information presented in Force Of Nature has been developed for the education and entertainment of the reader by providing a sequence of historical events with commentary. The Whole Truth From An Independent Perspective !
Force Of Nature is the brainchild of William H. Gathercole and his entourage. Norah G is actually an acronym for the stable of anonymous producers and writers that contribute to this e–newsletter and have now replaced Mr. Gathercole. They consist of people from the following industries : Distribution, Fertilizer, Golf, Lawn Care, Manufacturing, Municipal, Nursery, and Orchard. Many of these people are leaders in their own industries. The opinions expressed in Force Of Nature, even though from an INDEPENDENT PERSPECTIVE, may not reflect those of everyone in the Green Space Industry. Force Of Nature may sometimes be very irreverent and fearless with these e–newsletters. Although Force Of Nature appears to be Anti Environment Movement, it is, in fact, simply a strong advocate FOR the Modern Green Space Industry. However, this position has not precluded Force Of Nature from criticizing the Green Space Industry itself.
William H. Gathercole is a principal FOUNDER of the Modern Professional Lawn Care Industry in BOTH Ontario and Quebec. He holds a degree in Horticulture from the UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH, and another pure and applied science degree from McGILL UNIVERSITY. He has worked in virtually all aspects of the Green Space Industry, including GOLF and PROFESSIONAL LAWN CARE, and has served in public affairs, workplace safety, and environmental compliance. Mr. Gathercole has supervised, consulted, programmed, and/or overseen the execution of HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of pest control applications in the urban landscape. He has trained, instructed, and consulted with THOUSANDS of turf managers and technicians. Mr. Gathercole has also been an agricultural agronomist. For many years, Mr. Gathercole was a contributing columnist for TURF & Recreation Magazine, Canada’s Turf and Grounds Maintenance Authority. Mr. Gathercole is now retired from Force Of Nature, although his name continues to appear as the founder.
Mr. Gathercole has followed the evolution of ENVIRONMENTAL TERRORISM for over a quarter century. His involvement in Environmental Issues reached a fevered pitch in the 1990s, when he orchestrated, with his colleagues, legal action against the Forces of Environmental Evil in the Town of Hudson, Quebec. For FIFTEEN YEARS, the strategies designed and implemented by Mr. Gathercole and his colleagues guaranteed the control of Environmental Terror for the entire Modern Green Space Industry across Canada. Mr. Gathercole is personally credited for crafting the Golf Industry Exception Status, that endures to this day. He is also the creator of the signs that are now used for posting after application. His vast knowledge of our long journey with Environmental Issues is UNDENIABLE. (Hopefully !)
Force Of Nature is the instrument of National Organization Responding Against Huje that seek to TERRORIZE, HARM, and THREATEN the Green Space Industry (NORAHG) by routinely concocting FEAR MONGERING, FRAUDULENT LIES, MISCONCEPTIONS, COERCION, THREATS, DECEPTIONS, TERROR, and PARANOID CONSPIRACIES that are designed to SCAM and DECEIVE the public into believing that families are in some NONEXISTENT danger with conventional pest control products. They also SCAM and DECEIVE Government Officials into the NEEDLESS, SENSELESS, and MALICIOUS prohibition of FEDERALLY LEGAL, SCIENTIFICALLY SAFE, TOTALLY IRREPLACEABLE, and ABSOLUTELY INDISPENSABLE conventional pest control products. Enviro Maniac Activists are identified on the basis of their statements, activities, affiliations, and whereabouts. Even though each Enviro Maniac Culprit is a misguided adversary, each still deserves our respect. The use of the terms Maniac, Culprit, Terrorist, or Basterd are not accusations of any legal wrong doing. Force Of Nature is simply holding Enviro–Maniac–Activists accountable for conspiring to change public policies that TERRORIZE, HARM, and THREATEN the Green Space Industry. Their pretentious prohibitionist rants has created LOSS OF REVENUES, BUSINESS FAILURES, BANKRUPTCY, and UNEMPLOYMENT, inflicting DESPAIR and DESTITUTION for THOUSANDS of hapless victims throughout the Green Space Industry. The DEPRAVED INDIFFERENCE of Maniac Culprit Terrorist Basterds is viewed as a form of TERROR, HARM, and THREAT against the Green Space Industry. Additionally, Force Of Nature inspires people to believe that ENVIRONMENTAL TERRORISM can be STOPPED ! The events, characters, companies, and organizations, depicted in this document are not always fictitious. Any similarity to actual persons, living or dead, may not be coincidental. All document excerpts and pictures contained in Force Of Nature were found somewhere on the Internet. These documents and pictures are in the public domain, serving one of the following purposes : archive, education, promotion, publicity, or press release.
The following Force Of Nature documents are currently available ― ● A Look At ● Alberta Conspiracy ● British Columbia Conspiracy ● Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment ● Canadian Cancer Society ● Canadian Environmental Law Association ● Carnage ● Consequences ● Culprit ● David Suzuki Foundation ● Dating Services for Enviro Maniacs ● DDT and Politicized Science ● Death and the Environmental Terror Movement ● Enviro Profit ● Environmental Terrorists Unmasked ● Fertilizer Terror ● Hero ● June Irwin, the Clown of Junk Science ● Kazimiera Jean Cottam ● Landscape Trades Capitulate ● Lying Sac of Enviro–Maniac Cwap ● Myth–Busting ● Needless Hysteria ● New Brunswick Conspiracy ● Newfoundland Conspiracy ● Nova Scotia Conspiracy ● Ontario Conspiracy ● Organic Fertilizers ● Paranoid Theories ● Pesticide Free BC ● Pets and Lawn Care Chemicals ● Positive Waves ● Prince Edward Island Conspiracy ● Quebec Conspiracy ● Rachel Carson, the Queen of Junk Science ● Reining a Terrorist Reaction ● Salmon Arm BC Conspiracy ● Satire ● Terror NEVER Ends ● The 9/11 Era of the Green Space Industry ● The Bin Laden of Enviro Terror, Paul Tukey ● The Failure of Integrated Pest Management ● The Looming Golf Industry Shipwreck ● The Industry Strikes Back ● The Misconceptions About Cancer ● The National Annihilation of the Modern Green Space Industry ● The Wisdom of Bill Bell ● The Wisdom of Drysdale ● The Wisdom of Health Canada ● The Wisdom of Holland ● The Wisdom of Lowes ● The Wisdom of Mains ● The Wisdom of the Solomons ● Update ● Warning ● Ask For a Copy of Any Back Issue of Force Of Nature Today. Read All About Enviro Maniac Activists and their Environmental Terror Organizations in Force Of Nature ! The Whole Truth From An Independent Perspective ! Force Of Nature is TOTALLY INDEPENDENT of any trade association or business operating within the Green Space Industry. DON’T THANK US. IT’S A PUBLIC SERVICE.
───────────────
Are all your posts based on lies like this one is?
ReplyDeleteDDT wasn't removed from the third world, leading to millions of malaria deaths. It was banned in the developed world, and in the third world taken out of agricultural use. It was NEVER banned for use in mosquito control - in fact, was specifically given exceptions in treaties. The reason it hasn't worked is that mosquitoes developed resistance to DDT due to overuse (especially agricultural use). The simple fact is that it was used, and is still used, for mosquito control in the third world.
Of course, if you base your entire stance on a quote from a FICTION book, then what can you expect?
Even a quick look at the relevant Wikipedia page would point you to factual sources that disprove your entire point. If you have any self-respect, you'll remove this disgusting and false blog post.
Unless your intent is to discredit the pro-pesticide movement - in which case, job well done!
Posting by Erich Hawkins. This guy's gotta be a member of the Green Party or something.
ReplyDelete